Contact
+ Contact Form
Search
+ Search Form
Introduction
+ Aims & Scope
+ Structure
+ History
Announcements
+ Updates
+ Calls for Papers
+ New Lectures
+ New Publications
Alphabetical Index
+ Author Index
+ Speaker Index
Chronological Index
+ Ancient History
+ Medieval History
+ Modern History
Geographical Index
+ African History
+ American History
+ Asian History
+ European History
+ Oceanian History
Topical Index
+ Prosecution
+ Cases
+ Types
+ Offenders
+ Victims
+ Society
+ Research
+ Representations
Resources
+ Institutions
+ Literature Search
+ Research
|
Start:
Alphabetical Index:
Author Index:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
Unknown
First published: May 1, 2024 - Last updated: May 1, 2024
TITLE INFORMATION
Authors: Andrew P. Davis and Morgan Johnstonbaugh
Title: Safe at home?
Subtitle: Examining the extension of criminal penalties for marital rape in cross-national context, 1979–2013
Journal: Law & Society Review
Volume: 58
Issue: 1
Year: March 2024 (Received: February 13, 2022, Revised: June 20, 2023, Accepted: October 23, 2023, Published online: March 27, 2024)
Pages: 126-148
pISSN: 0023-9216 -
Find a Library: WorldCat |
eISSN: 1540-5893 -
Find a Library: WorldCat
Language: English
Keywords:
Modern History:
20th Century,
21st Century |
Types:
Rape /
Marital Rape
FULL TEXT
Links:
- Cambridge Core (Free Access)
- ResearchGate (Free Access)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Authors:
-
Andrew P. Davis,
Department of Sociology & Anthropology,
North Carolina State University -
ORCID,
ResearchGate
-
Morgan Johnstonbaugh:
Author's Personal Website
Abstract:
»While sociologists have focused on the national adoption of public-sphere women’s rights such as the right to vote in elections or participate fully in economic matters, less work has examined the diffusion of private-sphere women’s rights, rights of women in the home. We address this gap by examining the cross-national adoption of laws that criminalize marital rape. Building on prior research that finds that women’s rights organizations and women’s rights focused treaties, we explore the cross-national determinants of the criminalization of marital rape. Using an event history analysis covering 131 countries from 1979 to 2013, we find support for the global institutionalist framework that contends that socialization into the global system and direct advocacy efforts of global organizations contribute to faster rates of criminalization of marital rape. Further, we suggest that these global institutionalist processes become amplified when they are focused by events that set the agenda for international organizations. Implications for world-society scholarship on the global adoption of women’s rights are further discussed.«
(Source: Law & Society Review)
Contents:
|
Abstract (p. 126) |
|
Private-sphere women’s rights (p. 128) |
|
Historical background: criminalization of marital rape (p. 129) |
|
Explanations for the diffusion of private-sphere women’s rights (p. 130) |
|
|
Global norms, international organizations and women’s rights organizations (p. 130) |
|
|
Human rights treaties and INGO enforcement (p. 132) |
|
Research design (p. 132) |
|
|
Dependent variable (p. 134) |
|
|
Independent variables (p. 135) |
|
|
Controls (p. 137) |
|
Results (p. 139) |
|
Discussion and conclusions (p. 139) |
|
Notes (p. 144) |
|
References (p. 144) |
Wikipedia:
Sex and the law:
Rape /
Marital rape
|